Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Core i3-2367M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 2019 days newer than Core i3-2367M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2367M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Core i3-2367M - 149 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2367M - 12 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€191.69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €191.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44038 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Single-Core
227
21.254681647940075%
Multi-Core
491
10.72520751419834%
Intel Core i3-2367M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |