Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4336 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 98% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €10.66 vs €585.0
- Up to 98% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-13900F - €0.05 vs €2.25 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-2100 - 260 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
229
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€10.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €10.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Buy for €585 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |