Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1654 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - €10.63 vs €168.88
- Up to 94% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-6100 - €0.04 vs €0.66 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-2100 - 255 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-2100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
250
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€10.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €10.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 237 minutes ago
Buy for €168.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |