Buy on Amazon
€10.61
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3677 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - €10.61 vs €69.02
- Up to 86% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i3-10105F - €0.02 vs €0.14 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 9% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i3-2100 - 490 vs 451 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 8 vs 4 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i3-2100
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
451
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€10.61
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-2100 3.10 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 3 MB Cache 65 W CPU Processore LGA 1155
Buy for €10.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
490
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
14%
Price, €
€69.02
15%
FPS Winner
Intel, processore desktop Core i3-10105F 10, di 10ᵃ generazione (frequenza di base: 3,7 GHz, turbo boost: 4,4 GHz, 4 core, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i3-2100
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
