Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 2242 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-2100 - 167 vs 151 FPS
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i3-2100 - €74.44 vs €113.23
- Up to 40% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-2100 - €0.45 vs €0.75 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
151
90.41916167664671%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
60%
Price, €
€113.23
65%
Buy for €113.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
466
41.4959928762244%
Multi-Core
954
20.016785564414604%
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |