Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-14100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-14100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 468 days older than the cheaper Core i3-14100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €164.4 vs €257.11
- Up to 35% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-13600K - €1.23 vs €1.89 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-14100F - 136 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
134
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€164.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €164.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.89/FPS
65%
Price, €
€257.11
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for €257.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |