Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 1955 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-9100 - 182 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - €59.99 vs €184.99
- Up to 64% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-14100F - €0.37 vs €1.02 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
36%
Price, €
€184.99
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €184.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
161
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |