Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100TE outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100TE is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100TE
- Performs up to 20% better in New World than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 125 vs 104 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100TE - 20 vs 8 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-13100TE
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
886
48.57456140350877%
Multi-Core
5378
85.89682159399456%
Intel Core i3-13100TE | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
