Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6300 - 165 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - €49.68 vs €137.19
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €137.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-13100 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |