Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2826 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-4690 - 218 vs 201 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 58 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - €43.99 vs €97.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-12100F - €0.22 vs €0.44 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18741 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
201
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18742 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 84 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |