Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100E outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100E is 2675 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100E
- Performs up to 39% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 71 vs 51 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100E - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-12100E
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100E | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 85 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
