Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 1828 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 5% better in Deathloop than Celeron G3900 - 178 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 28 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
169
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16349 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
28 W | TDP | 51 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |