Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - €151.33 vs €605.67
- Up to 70% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-14900K - €0.43 vs €1.45 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-10320 - 418 vs 353 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
353
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
418
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.45/FPS
29%
Price, €
€605.67
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €605.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |