Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F and the cheaper Core i3-10320 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €151.33 vs €271.25
- Up to 43% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-10700F - €0.43 vs €0.76 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-10320 - 357 vs 353 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
353
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
357
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
56%
Price, €
€271.25
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €271.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |