Buy on Amazon
€155.51
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-9600KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 478 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-9600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - €155.51 vs €250.1
- Up to 38% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-9600KF - €1.26 vs €2.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€155.51
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10320 (fase base: 3,80 GHZ; attacco: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box, BX8070110320
Buy for €155.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1664 minutes ago
Core i5-9600KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
62.06896551724138%
Price, €
€250.1
62%
Intel Core i5-9600KF processore 3,7 GHz Scatola 9 MB Cache intelligente
Buy for €250.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1663 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i5-9600KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
96.97542533081285%
Multi-Core
4626
81.05834939547924%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
