Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 6 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - €151.33 vs €261.39
- Up to 42% better value when playing Minecraft than Ryzen 3 3300X - €0.21 vs €0.36 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 2% better in Minecraft than Core i3-10320 - 736 vs 723 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
723
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
736
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
58%
Price, €
€261.39
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |