Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3431 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 12% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-2700K - 206 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - €69.02 vs €191.85
- Up to 67% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-2700K - €0.34 vs €1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Buy for €191.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |