Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105 is 2753 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-4930K - 122 vs 113 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i7-4930K - €106.95 vs €116.67
- Up to 15% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-4930K - €0.88 vs €1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 12 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
100%
Price, €
€106.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €106.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
Buy for €116.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i7-4930K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |