Buy on Amazon
€117.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 and the cheaper Core i3-10105F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-10105F - 133 vs 132 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - €69.02 vs €117.49
- Up to 41% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-10105 - €0.52 vs €0.88 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
59%
Price, €
€117.49
58%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-10105 - Processore desktop di 10° generazione (frequenza di base: 3,7 GHz, Turbo boost: 4,4 GHz, 4 core, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €117.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.02
100%
Value Winner
Intel, processore desktop Core i3-10105F 10, di 10ᵃ generazione (frequenza di base: 3,7 GHz, turbo boost: 4,4 GHz, 4 core, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €69.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i3-10105F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
