Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 22% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G3900 - 561 vs 459 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - €60.9 vs €98.09
- Up to 24% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-10100 - €0.13 vs €0.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €98.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 263 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
459
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 262 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |