Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 157 days older than Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 95 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 1% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-10100 - 220 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 64 vs 8 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77050 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1426
87.1638141809291%
Multi-Core
4215
30.089948600799545%
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |