Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2317 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Core i7-6700T - 204 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - €69.0 vs €194.5
- Up to 65% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-6700T - €0.34 vs €0.98 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 56 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
198
97.05882352941177%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
34.693877551020414%
Price, €
€194.5
35%
Buy for €194.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |