Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3225 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3225 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3410 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3225.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-3225 - 236 vs 224 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3225
- Up to 86% cheaper than Celeron G6900 - €10.74 vs €78.7
- Up to 85% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G6900 - €0.05 vs €0.33 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
224
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€10.74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €10.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3225 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |