Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4238 days newer than Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G550 - 232 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 32 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
