Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1187 days newer than Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G550 - 150 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10604 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |