Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 3657 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 86% better in War Thunder than Celeron G540 - 238 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 16 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
396
17.232375979112273%
Multi-Core
679
6.7947563294306015%
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
