Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2683 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G540 - 543 vs 503 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 16 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €434.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76572 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
396
23.418095801301007%
Multi-Core
679
8.431640382466162%
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |