Buy on Amazon
€255.58
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2863 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 24% better in New World than Celeron G530 - 120 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 16 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, processore Wraith Prism per dissipatore di calore (32 MB, 8 core, velocità 4,4 GHz, 65 W)
Buy for €255.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11553 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G530
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Celeron G530 or Ryzen 7 3700X
New World, 1920 x 1080, Very High
75 FPS
€16.52/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Ryzen 7 3700X
32 GB, 480 GB SSD + 1.953125 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
€1,239
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
