Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5930K outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5930K is 1310 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-5930K - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5930K
- Performs up to 5% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron G4900 - 478 vs 456 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i7-5930K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
53.28719723183391%
Multi-Core
1051
19.17883211678832%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-5930K |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
