Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 2165 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 54 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 3% better in War Thunder than Celeron G4900 - 142 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €203.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75050 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
87.12871287128714%
Multi-Core
1051
42.56784123126772%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |