Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 455 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 54 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Death Stranding than Celeron G4900 - 227 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €182.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
40.87591240875913%
Multi-Core
1051
24.86985328916233%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |