Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2038 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-3240 - 111 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
