Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1947 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Fortnite than Celeron G1620 - 215 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
