Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 833 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 54 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G4900 - 219 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€1099.9
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,099.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76510 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
36.754176610978526%
Multi-Core
1051
8.508054723548936%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |