Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 236 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 2% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G4900 - 143 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
52.604611443210935%
Multi-Core
1051
13.940840960339568%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
