Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 1827 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 25% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G3930T - 467 vs 375 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 24 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
467
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€492.28
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €492.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |