Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 552 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 24% better in Starfield than Celeron G3930T - 56 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €221.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
42.38205723124517%
Multi-Core
948
22.89855072463768%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |