Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 1288 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 17% better in Far Cry 5 than Celeron G3930T - 217 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 32 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€1099.9
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,099.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76517 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
32.69689737470167%
Multi-Core
948
7.674249170242047%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |