Buy on Amazon
€149.11
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 915 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 12% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G3930T - 287 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
287
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€149.11
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, processore Wraith Prism per dissipatore di calore (32 MB, 8 core, velocità 4,4 GHz, 65 W)
Buy for €149.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 289 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
