Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2200 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €63.66 vs €717.24
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 51 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 17% better in Dead Space than Celeron G3930 - 169 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76173 minutes ago
Buy for €717.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
19.581320450885666%
Multi-Core
1043
4.777172170567489%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |