Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - €63.66 vs €276.66
- Up to 68% better value when playing New World than Core i9-11900F - €0.64 vs €2.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 35% better in New World than Celeron G3930 - 135 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
100
74.07407407407408%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.02/FPS
31.683168316831683%
Price, €
€276.66
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for €276.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
28.00552740672501%
Multi-Core
1043
11.372805582815397%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |