Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600 is 897 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-8600 - €60.9 vs €368.88
- Up to 82% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-8600 - €0.19 vs €1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600
- Performs up to 9% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3900 - 351 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
322
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13410 minutes ago
Buy for €368.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13410 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |