Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 1077 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 51 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3900 - 271 vs 256 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 64 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
256
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 13th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
2 | Threads | 64 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |