Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $899
Availability
MSRP in USD: $899
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1095 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 8% better in Remnant II than Celeron G3900 - 86 vs 80 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
