Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is 1803 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1840 - 122 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Celeron G1840 - 15 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65399 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
58.314087759815244%
Multi-Core
854
33.608815426997246%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 15 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
No | Overclockable | No |