Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 1536 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-8300 - 53 vs 62 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 4% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G1820 - 144 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
37.7401998462721%
Multi-Core
825
21.568627450980394%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 62 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |