Buy on Amazon
€7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1129 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 89% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - €7.0 vs €63.66
- Up to 89% better value when playing Remnant II than Celeron G3930 - €0.09 vs €0.8 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Remnant II than Celeron G1820 - 80 vs 79 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 51 vs 53 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1820 2.70 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 2 MB Cache 53 W CPU Processore LGA 1150
Buy for €7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3442 minutes ago
Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3441 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 53 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
