Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2410 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 53 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 10% better in God of War than Celeron G1820 - 179 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
28.39791787160208%
Multi-Core
825
8.225324027916251%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
