Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1187 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 1700 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1820 - 337 vs 319 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
337
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€229.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1959 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
48.85572139303483%
Multi-Core
825
16.176470588235293%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 1700 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 2nd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |