Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2044 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 9% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G1820 - 134 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
46.67300380228137%
Multi-Core
825
27.38134749419184%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
